\| View Thread \| Return to Index \| Read Prev Msg \| Read Next Msg \|

Hi Michael,

Posted By: Gerry L. <ger@hokupa.ifa.hawaii.edu> (a24b31n71client161.hawaii.rr.com)
Date: 9/25/1 - 21:23:18

In Response To: For me it's sufficiant. (Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany))

I have stated in earlier articles I've penned that it seems plausible that both types of Speedmaster likely made it to the moon. But plausibility and fact are not one and the same. What I am agreeing with Chuck on here is that it would be nice to see real evidence on whether the c861 Speedmasters ever made it to the moon. To merely assert it is not sufficient for me as a scientist, and I imagine historians have to wrestle with this problem all the time. The situation we have now is rather interesting. It is STILL NOT TOO LATE to have had the real facts blurred by time. If the proper research is done, we can uncover the truth. Chuck is advocating the search for the truth via some form of documentation and perhaps physical evidence (i.e. a photo). I think this is a great idea. I hope I can find out something. The problem is that the longer we wait, the more blurred things become - and this is how assertions become defacto truth - even of they are wrong!

For me, the Speedmaster holds a special place in history precisely because of its involvement in the space program and I would really like to know which watches made it to the moon.

All the best - and enjoy your collecting.

Aloha,

Gerry

Messages in This Thread

What makes you so suspicious? Here comes more... - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/24/1 - 16:49:32
- I agree with Chuck on this ... - Gerry L. -- 9/24/1 - 22:47:55
  - For me it's sufficiant. - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/25/1 - 18:19:34
    - As long as it's expressed that way, I have no difficulties with > - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/25/1 - 23:34:02
      - Not a matter. - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/26/1 - 17:06:44
        
        NASA docs cast additional light (& doubt) on your theories...> - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/27/1 - 00:31:38
        
        More additional light - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/27/1 - 21:18:18
        
        As for me, I'll continue to search for the answer. Pt . 2 - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/28/1 - 07:56:12
        
        As for me, I'll continue to search for the answer. Pt 1 - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/28/1 - 07:17:42
        
        But wait... There's more... > - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/27/1 - 09:47:21
        
        Sorry for double posting! (nt) - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/26/1 - 17:08:35
      - Not a matter. - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/26/1 - 17:05:05
    - Hi Michael, - Gerry L. -- 9/25/1 - 21:23:18
  - The Scientific Method... & a personal note... --> - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/25/1 - 13:56:17
    - Chuck - you flatter me. Thanks ... - Gerry L. -- 9/25/1 - 16:35:42
      - Without ... would we have ... ? > - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/25/1 - 18:08:25
        
        Chuck - we have GOT to get together! - Gerry L. -- 9/25/1 - 21:24:59
        
        I would be happy to. The question then becomes: - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/25/1 - 22:54:44
- Circumstantial evidence is not conclusive... > - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/24/1 - 19:43:54
  - This debate should go in TZ classics! - Timothy -- 9/24/1 - 22:29:59

\| View Thread \| Return to Index \| Read Prev Msg \| Read Next Msg \|

Omega Watch Forum - Page 4
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15