\| View Thread \| Return to Index \| Read Prev Msg \| Read Next Msg \|

I agree with Chuck on this ...

Posted By: Gerry L. <ger@hokupa.ifa.hawaii.edu> (a24b31n71client161.hawaii.rr.com)
Date: 9/24/1 - 22:47:55

In Response To: What makes you so suspicious? Here comes more... (Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany))

As a scientist, I prefer emperical evidence to mere statement of fact - no matter how authoritative a person the statement of fact originated from.

Michael, you seem to think Chuck needs to see photos of the 861 on the moon with the back unscrewed before he will be satisfied. I imagine he will be satisfied with some documentation from NASA about the watches they procurred and used. Since I know one of the current astronauts, and I work with NASA (although NOT the manned spaceflight division), perhaps I can research this further. I wonder where these watches are now, and where the documentation for them would be buried. Unlike many things in history, the case of the Speedmasters that went to the moon CAN be researched, and DOCUMENTATION can be provided to support claims. If that documentation is present in the French book you mention, then that is good enough for me. If not, then no matter how great the person who wrote the book, it is NOT sufficient evidence to be absolutely sure about which watches went to the moon.

But I find Chuck's tenacity refreshing. He seeks the truth. I admire him and his quest. I only wich more people thought the same way.

Aloha,

Gerry

Messages in This Thread

What makes you so suspicious? Here comes more... - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/24/1 - 16:49:32
- I agree with Chuck on this ... - Gerry L. -- 9/24/1 - 22:47:55
  - For me it's sufficiant. - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/25/1 - 18:19:34
    - As long as it's expressed that way, I have no difficulties with > - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/25/1 - 23:34:02
      - Not a matter. - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/26/1 - 17:06:44
        
        NASA docs cast additional light (& doubt) on your theories...> - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/27/1 - 00:31:38
        
        More additional light - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/27/1 - 21:18:18
        
        As for me, I'll continue to search for the answer. Pt . 2 - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/28/1 - 07:56:12
        
        As for me, I'll continue to search for the answer. Pt 1 - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/28/1 - 07:17:42
        
        But wait... There's more... > - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/27/1 - 09:47:21
        
        Sorry for double posting! (nt) - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/26/1 - 17:08:35
      - Not a matter. - Michael Stein (Cologne-Germany) -- 9/26/1 - 17:05:05
    - Hi Michael, - Gerry L. -- 9/25/1 - 21:23:18
  - The Scientific Method... & a personal note... --> - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/25/1 - 13:56:17
    - Chuck - you flatter me. Thanks ... - Gerry L. -- 9/25/1 - 16:35:42
      - Without ... would we have ... ? > - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/25/1 - 18:08:25
        
        Chuck - we have GOT to get together! - Gerry L. -- 9/25/1 - 21:24:59
        
        I would be happy to. The question then becomes: - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/25/1 - 22:54:44
- Circumstantial evidence is not conclusive... > - Chuck Maddox (Chicagoland area) -- 9/24/1 - 19:43:54
  - This debate should go in TZ classics! - Timothy -- 9/24/1 - 22:29:59

\| View Thread \| Return to Index \| Read Prev Msg \| Read Next Msg \|

Omega Watch Forum - Page 4
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15